第20册
出版日期: 2005年9月
----------------------------------------
已出版的个案摘要
----------------------------------------
|
案件编号 |
下载 |
呈述案件 |
|
|
threshold of arguability — what constitutes a proper question of law which can be included in a case stated — whether formulated questions were plainly and obviously unarguable [英文案例] |
D26/05 |
|
补加税评税 |
|
|
上诉人的错误申报 – 不小心填错报税表和全无动机瞒税 – 税务局在处理有关评税时犯有错误能不能构成上诉人犯错的辩解 – 上诉人在收了警告信后是不是完全忽视有关的警告和对报税的责任仍然抱有一种轻率或鲁莽的态度 – 《税务条例》第82A条 |
D88/04 |
|
利得税 |
|
|
anti-avoidance — ss 61 and 61A of the Inland Revenue Ordinance ("IRO") — whether transaction artificial or fictitious — whether transaction entered into for the sole or dominant purpose of obtaining a tax benefit — interposition of company — relevance of Salomon v A Salomon and Co Ltd [1897] AC 22 in anti-avoidance cases [英文案例] |
D96/04 |
|
deduction of loan interest expenses and related expenditure borrowed for the purpose of producing chargeable profits under s 16(1)(a) — whether further conditions in subsection (2) were satisfied — whether the "Ramsay principle" was applicable to s 16 of the Inland Revenue Ordinance ("IRO") — whether there was any artificial or fictitious transaction — whether the sole or dominant purpose was the obtaining of a tax benefit - onus of proving assessment excessive or incorrect was on the appellant — ss 16(1)(a) & (2)(d), 17(1)(b), 51(4)(a), 61, 61A & 68(4) of the IRO [英文案例] |
D95/04 |
|
deduction of loan interest expenses and related expenditure borrowed for the purpose of producing chargeable profits under s 16(1)(a) — whether further conditions in subsection (2) were satisfied — whether the "Ramsay principle" was applicable to s 16 of the Inland Revenue Ordinance ("IRO") — whether there was any artificial or fictitious transaction — whether the sole or dominant purpose was the obtaining of a tax benefit — onus of proving assessment excessive or incorrect was on the appellant — ss 16(1)(a) & (2)(d), 17(1)(b), 51(4)(a), 61, 61A & 68(4) of the IRO [英文案例] |
D94/04 |
|
whether interest on borrowing deductible — circular borrowing transactions within group of companies — whether transactions for the sole or dominant purpose of obtaining tax benefit — whether artificial or fictitious — Inland Revenue Ordinance ("IRO") ss 61 & 61A [英文案例] |
D97/04 |
|
whether interest on borrowing deductible — whether borrowing for the dominant purpose of obtaining tax benefit — borrowing was part of a facade — Inland Revenue Ordinance ("IRO") ss 61 and 61A [英文案例] |
D98/04 |
|
whether or not the Property was the appellant's trading stock — ss 2, 14(1) and 68(4) of the Inland Revenue Ordinance ("IRO") — whether the stated intention was in fact the intention of the appellant at the time of acquisition of the Property is a question of fact — whether or not the stated intention was genuinely held [英文案例] |
D90/04 |
|
薪俸税 |
|
|
逾期上诉 – 疾病及工作繁忙 –《税务条例》(第112章)第66条 – 居所贷款利息的扣减 – 《税务条例》第26E及68(4)条 |
D93/04 |
|
hotel, hostel or boarding house — ss 8(1)(a), 9(1), 9(1A), 9(2), 16(F) and 68(4) of the Inland Revenue Ordinance ("IRO") — s 2(1) of the Hotel and Guesthouse Accommodation Ordinance [英文案例] |
D91/04 |
|
注:未完成的上诉的最新状况会列於「原讼法庭税务上诉案件列表」或「上诉法庭/终审法院税务上诉案件列表」。如上诉已有最终结果,该上诉案的状况会列於上述其中一表,并於下期的税务上诉案例中不获刊载。
如要查看「原讼法庭/上诉法庭/终审法院税务上诉案件列表」(截至2005年8月31日的状况),请见附件。