Go to main content
 
LCQ15: Employees' compensation
******************************
     Following is a question by the Dr Hon Kwok Ka-ki and a written reply by the Secretary for Labour and Welfare, Dr Law Chi-kwong, in the Legislative Council today (January 17):

Question:

     According to the Employees' Compensation Ordinance (Cap. 282) (ECO), employees who have sustained an injury or died as a result of an accident which occurred in the course of their employment or those who have suffered from an occupational disease specified in ECO owing to the nature of their work may receive compensation under a no-fault principle.  On taking sick leave, receiving diagnoses and treatments as well as filing employees' compensation (EC) claims, etc. by employees injured at work, will the Government inform this Council, in respect of each year since 2012:

(1) of the number of cases in which the Labour Department (LD) instituted prosecutions against employers who had failed to take out EC insurance policies (commonly known as "labour insurance policies");

(2) of the respective numbers of cases in which LD issued warning letters and instituted prosecutions against employers who had failed to pay (i) periodical payments (i.e. sick leave payments) and (ii) medical expenses on time to employees injured at work and, among the prosecution cases, the respective numbers of those in which the employers were convicted;  

(3) of the respective numbers of EC claims received by LD, with a breakdown by whether the employees were incapacitated for (i) not more than or (ii) more than three days; among those claims involving an incapacitation period exceeding three days, the respective numbers of claims which were (iii) settled and (iv) unsettled within 12 months after they had been lodged, as well as (v) the total amount of compensation and (vi) the total number of lost working days involved in the former and (vii) the relevant reasons for the latter; among the claims involving an incapacitation period exceeding three days, (viii) the number of cases in which the employees concerned received a work capability assessment conducted by the Employees' Compensation Assessment Board after resuming duty, and (ix) the average time lapse between their resumption of duty and the conduct of the assessment;

(4) of the respective numbers of employees who were granted sick leave due to work injury for a period of (i) three to six months, (ii) more than six months to one year, (iii) more than one year to two years, and (iv) more than two years, with a tabulated breakdown by trade;

(5) of the number of EC claims filed with the court by employees, with a breakdown by case nature (i.e. injury or fatality);

(6) of the respective numbers of legal aid applications (i) received and (ii) approved by the Legal Aid Department (LAD) in respect of EC claims; in respect of the approved cases, the amount of expenditure incurred so far, as well as the average and median time taken from submission of applications to granting of approval;

(7) of (i) the respective numbers of EC claims with legal aid granted which were heard by the court (with a breakdown by result (i.e. claims awarded, dismissed or settled)), and (ii) the number of cases in which legal aid was discharged by LAD in the course of action; the respective highest, lowest, median and average amounts of compensation payable in the cases in which (iii) the court ruled in favour of the claimants concerned and (iv) settlement agreements were reached by both parties to proceedings;

(8) of the respective numbers of cases in which employees incapacitated as a result of a work injury (i) applied for and (ii) were granted Comprehensive Social Security Assistance, Normal Disability Allowance and Higher Disability Allowance, and the amount of expenditure involved in the approved cases for each type of allowances;

(9) of the attendances at the accident and emergency departments under the Hospital Authority (HA) by employees injured at work for diagnoses and treatments;

(10) of (i) the attendance at the specialist outpatient clinics (including orthopaedics, neurosurgery and surgery) under HA by employees injured at work for diagnoses and treatments, (ii) the attendance among them involving new cases, and (iii) the respective current average waiting time for the old and new cases concerned, broken down by specialty; and

(11) of the amount of expenditure incurred by the authorities on promoting the prevention of industrial accidents?

Reply:

President,

     In consultation with the Food and Health Bureau and the Legal Aid Department (LAD), my reply to the Member's question is as follows:

(1) From 2012 to 2017, the yearly number of summonses heard in respect of failure to take out employees' compensation insurance under the Employees' Compensation Ordinance (ECO) as processed by the Labour Department (LD) is provided below:
 
Year Number of summonses heard
2012 797
2013 1 024
2014 936
2015 868
2016 604
2017 717
 
(2) From 2012 to 2017, the yearly numbers of summonses heard and convicted in respect of failure to pay periodical payments on time under ECO as processed by LD are provided below:
 
Year Number of summonses
heard
Number of summonses convicted
2012 32 24
2013 28 25
2014 19 14
2015 26 26
2016 93 61
2017 41 32
 
     LD does not keep the number of warning letters issued to employers for failure to pay periodical payments and medical expenses to employees under ECO.  Besides, since failure to pay medical expenses is not a prosecutable offence under ECO, LD does not have the related prosecution and conviction figures.

(3) From 2012 to 2017, the yearly number of employees' compensation claims reported under ECO and received by LD is provided below:
 
Duration of incapacitation 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Not more than three days 16 266 16 096 15 531 14 994 15 134 14 645
More than three days* 40 497 39 072 38 386 36 923 36 420 36 463
Total 56 763 55 168 53 917 51 917 51 554 51 108
*  Figures include fatal cases.
 
     From 2012 to 2017, of the compensation claims involving incapacitation of employees for more than three days reported under ECO and received by LD in each year, the number of claims settled in the same respective year, the total amount of compensation involved and the total number of working days lost are provided below:
 
  2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Number of claims settled in the same respective year 24 909 23 740 23 054 22 538 22 156 21 066
Total amount of compensation involved
($million)
214.3 226.4 233.0 270.5 272.5 250.8
Total number of working days lost* 394 090 396 705 390 353 408 292 407 679 375 027
* The number of working days lost includes both the number of sick leave days granted and taken and the period of absence from duty certified to be necessary by the Employees' Compensation Assessment Board under ECO.

     From 2012 to 2017, of the compensation claims involving incapacitation of employees for more than three days reported under ECO and received by LD in each year, the number of claims which were not settled in the same respective year is provided below:
 
  2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Number of claims not settled in the same respective year 15 588 15 332 15 332 14 385 14 264 15 397
 
     The above claims were not settled in the same respective year owing to various reasons, such as awaiting expiry of employees' sick leave, assessment of permanent incapacity or court judgment.

     If the employees sustain work injuries which result in incapacitation for more than three days and will likely result in permanent total or partial incapacity, LD will arrange the employees to attend an assessment conducted by the Employees' Compensation Assessment Board (ECAB) after they have recovered or their medical conditions have stabilised.  The assessments are conducted by the relevant specialty departments (mainly the Orthopaedics and Accident and Emergency (A&E) Departments) in 16 hospitals under the Hospital Authority (HA).  Employees' waiting time will be affected by the different frequency of ECAB meetings convened by the specialty departments of different hospitals.  From 2012 to 2017, the total number of assessments conducted by ECAB and the average waiting time for employees who were arranged to attend assessments after they had recovered or their medical conditions had stabilised in each year are provided below:
 
Year Number of assessments Average waiting time (in terms of weeks)+
2012 22 229 11
2013 23 342 12
2014 23 164 11
2015 23 599 11
2016 22 995 10
2017 19 718
(as at end-November)*
10
* The 2017 yearly figure is under preparation.
+ Involving the Orthopaedics and A&E Departments.  Assessments by other specialty departments were arranged according to actual needs.

     LD does not keep the number of cases and average waiting time for employees who were arranged to attend assessments after their resumption of duty.

(4) From 2012 to 2017, the number of compensation claims settled in each year involving incapacitation of employees for more than three days (including compensation claims reported in or before the respective settlement year) with a breakdown by the number of working days lost is provided below:
 
Number of working days lost Number of settled compensation claims
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Below 90 days 31 011 29 144 28 107 27 824 26 686 25 251
90 to below 180 days 2 753 2 706 2 783 2 902 2 787 2 741
180 to below 360 days 1 957 2 006 2 196 2 334 2 366 2 296
360 to below 720 days 1 573 1 381 1 765 1 795 1 956 1 801
720 days or above 5 6 2 3 1 2
Total 37 299 35 243 34 853 34 858 33 796 32 091
 
     If the work injury sick leave of an employee does not exceed three days and no permanent incapacity is involved, the employer should make direct payment of compensation to the employee in accordance with ECO.  LD does not keep statistics on the number of working days lost for this type of cases.  Moreover, LD does not keep statistics on compensation claims with breakdowns by the number of employees or occupation.

(5) From 2012 to 2017, of the reported compensation claims involving incapacitation of employees for more than three days, the number of claims where employees sought legal aid or adjudication by the Court with a breakdown by fatal or injury cases is provided below:
 
Year Number of claims where employees sought legal aid or adjudication by the Court (as at the end of the reporting year of the claims)
Injury cases Fatal cases Total
2012 629 8 637
2013 587 7 594
2014 655 11 666
2015 664 5 669
2016 701 9 710
2017 732 20 752
 
     The employer should make direct payment of compensation to the employee in accordance with ECO if the work injury sick leave of the employee does not exceed three days and no permanent incapacity is involved.  LD does not keep statistics on the number of claims where employees sought adjudication by the Court for this type of cases.

(6) From 2012 to 2017, the numbers of legal aid applications, certificates granted and the median and average time taken to complete the processing of applications by LAD in respect of employees' compensation claims in each year are provided below:
 
  Employees' compensation claims
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Number of legal aid applications received 2 276 2 165 2 267 2 135 2 076 2 157
Number of legal aid certificates granted* 1 483 1 241 1 411 1 300 1 325 1 313
Processing time (calendar days) Median 63 62 62 63 64 64
Average 58.62 60.48 61.79 63.97 65.50 64.90
*  Legal aid certificates may not be granted in the same year as the applications were received.

     From 2012-13 to 2016-17 financial years, the legal aid costs spent on cases in respect of employees' compensation claims are provided below:
 
Employees' compensation claims
Financial year 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Legal aid costs
($thousand)
47,048.3 50,491.5 51,188.7 54,657.2 61,413.6
 
(7) From 2012 to 2017, the success rates of legal aid cases in respect of employees' compensation claims which were closed in each year are provided below:
 
  Employees' compensation claims
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
In favour
 
94% 95% 96% 97% 96% 96%
Not in favour
 
1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
Discharged/ revoked prior to proceedings 1% 1% 1% 0% 1% 1%
Discharged at aided person's request during proceedings 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1%
Discharged/ revoked during proceedings 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
Total
 
100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
 
     From 2012 to 2017, the highest, lowest, median and average amounts of damages received in legal aid cases in respect of employees' compensation claims that were closed in each year are provided below:
 
  Amounts of compensation awarded in employees' compensation claims
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Highest
($thousand)
12,200.00 1,913.46 2,553.57 2,979.80 3,756.00 3,360.62
Lowest
($thousand)
1.7 1.0 3.0 2.0 1.3 1.0
Median
($thousand)
100.00 102.11 130.00 137.26 150.00 150.00
Average
($thousand)
177.87 174.59 211.18 203.76 231.39 236.42
Note: The amount of compensation awarded was low in some employees' compensation cases because of various reasons, e.g. the percentage of loss of earning capacity assessed was low or the final award was made after deducting a large amount of advance payment such as sick leave payment already received.

(8) The Social Welfare Department does not keep the statistics and the expenditure for employees with work-related injuries under the Comprehensive Social Security Assistance Scheme and Disability Allowance.

(9) and (10) HA does not have complete statistics on the treatment for work-related injuries under ECO, including the number of attendance and average waiting time of A&E Departments and specialist outpatient clinics or hospitals in HA.  The number of attendances of A&E Departments in HA arising from industrial trauma and the number of subsequent attendances for specialist outpatient (clinical) services among the aforementioned patients from 2012-13 to 2016-17 financial years are set out in the table below:
 
Financial
year
Number of A&E attendances arising from industrial trauma
(A)
Among those patients as described in (A) who subsequently made a booking for specialist outpatient (clinical) services within 28 days after their A&E attendances or inpatient discharges
2012-13 70 758 48 878
2013-14 69 268 48 142
2014-15 67 812 47 485
2015-16 66 755 48 134
2016-17 65 980 48 541
Note: It should be noted that not all medical treatment subsequently received by the above patients after their A&E attendance are necessarily related to their industrial trauma.

(11) LD adopts a multi-pronged strategy to enhance occupational safety and health (OSH) through inspection and enforcement, education and training as well as publicity and promotion.  In respect of publicity, education and promotion, LD organises promotional campaigns to enhance OSH awareness of employers and employees in various industries through training courses, seminars, roving exhibitions, out-reaching promotional visits, television and radio Announcements in the Public Interest, OSH messages disseminated through newspapers and LD's webpages, and compilation and updating of safety guidelines.  A number of these activities are organised in collaboration with the Occupational Safety and Health Council, trade associations and workers' unions.  The above work is an integral part of LD's ongoing work, and the expenditure cannot be separately identified.
 
Ends/Wednesday, January 17, 2018
Issued at HKT 15:30
NNNN
Today's Press Releases