|
How innovative financial products affect financial stability Financial innovation can make it harder to identify and manage risk. No matter whether we are fund raisers, investors, financial intermediaries or financial authorities, I think we all agree that financial stability is in the public interest, although occasionally we hear the contrary, and probably minority, view that, at least for traders in financial markets, stability and prosperity do not go well together. In any case, financial market volatility is not necessarily synonymous with financial instability. But financial stability is a rather vague concept that is not easy to define, even by those responsible for achieving or maintaining it. This is not a comfortable position to be in, because it may lead to the use of ad hoc approaches to maintaining financial stability, where political considerations could play a greater-than-desirable role in the decision-making process, undermining the long-term credibility of the financial authorities. It is therefore important to be as clear as possible about what financial stability means and the specific roles of the financial authorities in achieving it, something that has presented many jurisdictions with considerable difficulty. One reason for the difficulty is the continuing changes in the financial system. In the old days when the financial system consisted only of banks intermediating funds between borrowers and depositors, financial stability could be taken as the continuing ability of the banking system to carry on doing so through thick and thin, enabling those with good credit to ride out economic cycles and taking the occasional hit from credit defaults without disrupting depositorsˇ¦ confidence. Banks needed to be supervised to prevent them from taking on excessive credit risks that might undermine their viability and depositorsˇ¦ confidence when there was an economic downturn. Prudential supervision of banks was often supplemented by depositor-protection schemes through insurance or other means. As we all know, the financial system is now much more than just the banks taking deposits and making loans, and earning a spread to cover the costs and the risks that occasionally materialise. Thanks to the development of the capital markets, the financial system also plays a very important role in matching the risk profiles of fund raisers and the risk appetite of investors, with the latter directly and increasingly assuming the risks of the former, rather than leaving it to the banks, insulating them from the credit risks of the borrowers. This has raised the efficiency of the financial system in intermediating funds considerably, to the benefit of the economy as a whole, by making financial resources more easily available, lowering the costs of raising funds, improving investorsˇ¦ rates of return, and bringing a lot more business and a lot less risk to the financial intermediaries. In these new circumstances financial stability can still be defined as a continuation of this desirable state of financial affairs through economic cycles, with the financial authorities focusing on the maintenance of market integrity through different forms of market regulation. But the modern financial system is even more complicated than this, making it even harder for the financial authorities to comprehend. Financial innovation has enabled the credit risks of the fund raisers to be spread to outside the financial system and assumed by investors instead, through the use of tradable (at least under normal market conditions) financial products. The financial system is so efficient at this that it has become rather difficult to identify what risks are involved, where they lie, and whether those assuming them are aware of them, let alone whether they are in a position to manage the risks in the first place. Take the sub-prime mortgage market as an example. The parties involved include the originators of the sub-prime mortgage loans, the investment bankers packaging the loans into mortgage-backed securities, the investment managers buying the securities as part of the investment portfolios supporting the creation of collateralised debt obligations (CDO), the rating agencies assigning ratings to the CDOs, the hedge-fund managers buying the CDOs and the investors investing money in hedge funds. Many of the participants in this chain have an incentive to create and off-load derivative securities, earning handsome fees. There is a danger that prudent standards are being compromised in the process. Chances are that there is considerable leverage at different points in the chain, with funding provided by banks. And when there is a shock in the property market, the general economy, or arising from stress in the financial system itself, leading to default by the mortgagors, it is not clear who in the end will suffer and whether any, and if so which, part of the financial system may cease to function effectively. There is a need for a lot of vigilance by everyone involved in the financial system.
Joseph Yam ˇ@ Click here for previous articles in this column. ˇ@ |
ˇ@
