|
Reducing foreign-exchange settlement risk
Settlement
risk has been greatly reduced, but not yet eliminated.
Readers may
have noticed press reports about a consultative report issued last
month by the Committee on Payment and Settlement Systems of the Bank
for International Settlements entitled "Progress
in Reducing Foreign Exchange Settlement Risk". The report is a
useful update of the progress made over the past 10 years in
reducing the systemic risk arising from the settlement of foreign
exchange trades. It concludes that the strategy adopted by the G10
central banks, which pioneered the initiative of reducing settlement
risk in 1996, has achieved significant success, citing the
establishment and growth of CLS Bank1 as
one of the major achievements. But the report also identifies
remaining large and long-lasting exposures arising from settlement
of foreign exchange trades and recommends a range of actions to be
taken by individual institutions, industry groups and central banks
to reduce and control them.
The report
contains the results of a survey conducted by the Committee in the
second half of 2006, involving 27 central banks and 109 financial
institutions, covering 80% of the foreign exchange markets in 15
currency areas. According to the survey, the average daily foreign
exchange settlement obligations in April 2006 amounted to US$3.8
trillion, of which 32% were settled through the traditional
correspondent banking channel and therefore subject to settlement
risk. This represents a substantial improvement from 1997, when a
similar survey indicated that about 85% of the obligations were
settled by this method. The report concludes that the improvement
is attributable to the work of CLS Bank and an increasing use of
payment-versus-payment services now available in many jurisdictions,
including Hong Kong.
I am sure
readers of this column are familiar with my continuing encouragement
to all concerned in large-volume trading in financial markets to
manage their settlement risks. We move money around the world and
complete transactions by merely touching a few buttons on a
keyboard, thanks to advances in information technology. But perhaps
because of the ease of transferring large sums of money these days,
people may not be fully aware of the risk of not being able to get
what they are supposed to in return for their money, which is likely
to happen if the payments of the two parties are not done
simultaneously, or if there is no guarantee of compensation by a
third-party clearing house in case of default by either party.
The classic example of this kind of settlement risk is called Herstatt risk, a term originating from the failure of Bank Herstatt
in what was then West Germany in 1974 as a result of its failing to meet its
foreign exchange commitments. On the day when the bank was closed
down by the West German authorities, the bankˇ¦s counterparties in
New York, who had already been debited in Europe but had not yet
received the corresponding dollar amount due to them because of the
time difference suffered substantial losses. But settlement risks
can occur even in transactions carried out on a single day in the
same time zone if the financial infrastructure is not designed to
eliminate, or at least minimise, them.
The HKMA has
made a lot of effort over the years to help banks in Hong Kong to
reduce their settlement risk as far as possible by improving the
interbank payment infrastructure. Our aim is to build the most
advanced and reliable multi-currency, multi-dimensional platform to
provide real-time, payment-versus-payment and
delivery-versus-payment services to users. The first real-time
gross settlement (RTGS) system in Hong Kong for transactions
denominated in Hong Kong dollars was introduced in 1996. Since then
large-value interbank payments are no longer settled by end-of-day
netting, but on a continuous, deal-by-deal basis through the banksˇ¦
settlement accounts with the HKMA. As these payments are settled
one by one during the day, with payments for each transaction done
simultaneously and in gross amount, systemic settlement risks
arising from end-of-day netting are eliminated. In 2006 the Hong
Kong dollar RTGS system handled transactions involving $579 billion
each day. On 27 October 2006 the system registered a record
turnover of $1.37 trillion because of large initial public offerings.
Building on
the success of the Hong Kong dollar RTGS system, we introduced the
US dollar RTGS system in 2000 and the euro RTGS system in 2003. In
June this year we completed a system upgrade to introduce the
renminbi RTGS system. These four RTGS systems are linked, so that
users can now enjoy multi-currency as well as single-currency
real-time payment-versus-payment services in Hong Kong.
But the hard
work of financial infrastructure development does not end there. We
aim to develop Hong Kong into a regional payment and settlement hub
so that not only financial institutions in Hong Kong but also those
in the region or even on other continents can enjoy world-class
settlement services without worrying about settlement risk. System
development for using our US dollar and euro payment systems to
process cross-border payments in the region through Hong Kong is now
underway. We linked our US dollar RTGS system with Malaysia's
ringgit RTGS system in November 2006, and are pursuing opportunities
for similar links with other economies in the region. Put simply,
our aim is to make Hong Kong a place for financial institutions, and
indeed anyone, active in the foreign currency markets to do business
without having to worry about settlement risk.
As the BIS
report points out, there is still a lot of hard work ahead in order
to achieve the ultimate goal of making settlement risk a historical
term and to avoid the risk of backsliding. We will work with the
industry associations, and individual banks if necessary, to further
reduce the remaining settlement risks to maintain and build on Hong
Kongˇ¦s status as an international financial centre.
ˇ@
Joseph Yam
9 August 2007
ˇ@
1
CLS Group, which includes CLS Bank and CLS Services, was founded in
1997 to provide the first global settlement system for 15 currencies
and is supported by more than 70 international banking and financial
institutions. The CLS Bank acts as a clearing house for foreign exchange transactions.
ˇ@
Click here
for previous articles in this column.
ˇ@
|