|
China as a player in
international financial markets
Chinaˇ¦s growing
international importance is a good reason for its markets to be
linked to those of the rest of the world.
As readers are aware,
Mainland China is now the fourth largest economy in the world in
terms of GDP, the third largest trading nation, and the largest
holder of foreign reserves. Given that it is also one of the
fastest-growing economies, China is of increasing
significance on the world stage, whatever way we look at it.
In the area of
international finance, China is undoubtedly attracting increasing
attention: whether it is Chinaˇ¦s exchange rate policy, or
developments in its capital market, or how it manages its foreign
reserves, financial news from China probably hits the international
headlines more often than news from other jurisdictions. This is
despite the still relatively low degree of integration of Chinaˇ¦s
financial system with the global financial system, given exchange
controls and other restrictions on access to domestic financial
markets.
Recently, a sharp downward
adjustment in the A-share market was seen to have triggered similar
adjustments in stock markets in both Europe and America, and, some
have argued, the unwinding of the yen carry trade. Just how the
dynamics work is, to me at least, a mystery, given the immobility of
funds between the capital market on the Mainland and those in the
rest of the world. Perhaps much of this ˇ§contagionˇ¨ works through
market psychology, although it is easier to see why the fall in
A-share prices would affect H-shares than, for example, US share
prices.
Some have said that, after
the long bull run in equity markets worldwide, some adjustment was
inevitable, and the markets had, in any case, been looking for an
excuse to bring it about. Still, it is interesting that the
trigger on that occasion was deemed to come from China, although
the increasing concern over the sub-prime mortgage market in the US
may have played a role. Whatever it was, the increasing
significance of China in international finance is something that
investors need to be very alert to, if they are not so already. Hong
Kong investors, in particular, should pay much closer attention to
financial developments on the Mainland, as the Mainland content of
the Hong Kong stock market continues to increase and as our market
is now, by far, the principal free market in which foreign investors
can achieve significant Chinese exposure.
The increasing
significance of China in international finance extends to the
undisputedly desirable objective of financial authorities to
maintain financial stability. How well a globally important
jurisdiction maintains its own financial stability affects financial
stability in the rest of the world. It is therefore important not
only for facilitating sustainable economic development in China but
also for the stability of the global financial system, for China to
make its financial markets much more efficient and resilient to
shocks.
There are many areas in
which improvements can be made and these areas have been quite
comprehensively identified, both in the eleventh five-year plan last
year and in the National Finance Working Meeting earlier this year.
The sudden spike in financial market volatility in late February,
originating from the Mainland, serves to underline the importance of
these areas for reform. Reform always takes time and, particularly
in financial reform, great skill is required to arrive at a
consensus among parties with different interests that may be
narrower than the domestic public interest of achieving greater
financial efficiency, not to mention international interest in
maintaining global financial stability.
The partitioning of the
capital market into domestic and international segments that are not
fungible with each other, as indicated by the price differential
between them, greatly undermines the efficiency of the market in its
all-important function of price discovery. There is no doubt that
the market would be more efficient and prices less spiky if domestic
supply and demand were able to interact with international supply
and demand to form one bigger market (certainly bigger than the sum
of the two) with much greater liquidity.
Joseph Yam
5 April 2007
Click here
for previous articles in this column.
ˇ@
|
|