|
Linking the Mainland's and Hong Kong's financial markets There are good reasons to link the two financial markets. Our country is unique in having two financial systems at its disposal. They have different characteristics, reflecting history and the many differences between a socialist and a capitalist economy. Differences, of course, present opportunities for exploiting relative strengths, addressing relative weaknesses and maximising synergies. Differences also present opportunities for division of labour, specialisation in production, and improving productivity and the overall welfare of the people, as we all learned from Adam Smith in The Wealth of Nations. Taking advantage of these opportunities is obviously in the best interests of the country. Many years' observation of financial markets has led me to a few conclusions, one of which is simply that the bigger the market, the better. This is obviously nothing new or profound. The wider and deeper the market, the more liquid it is, and the more efficient the price-discovery process. And the less market concentration there is (which is often true of big markets), the smaller the scope for market manipulation. The ideal, of course, is to have millions of market participants on both the demand and supply sides, each commanding an insignificant share of the market and motivated by self interest to create a financial market that functions in the best interest of the public ˇV effective financial intermediation. For most financial products, there is also a need for a robust market infrastructure to efficiently match supply and demand, consummate and settle transactions, and manage the associated risks; but these are the subjects of my other conclusions, which I will talk about some other time. I believe the sheer size of the financial markets of the United States is an important factor in their efficiency, particularly in price discovery, and in their structural stability. Supported by an appropriately relaxed regulatory framework, seldom do we see in these large and efficient markets dislocations or disruptions of crisis proportions affecting the process of financial intermediation, which is essential to the economy. Anti-competitive behaviour or market manipulation in this type of market is also a lot less likely ˇV probably no market participant is big enough to push the market in any particular direction. By contrast, the situation of smaller, open markets is less benign. There is often much greater and sharper volatility, to the extent of threatening financial stability or even the viability of the financial system. Such volatility may undermine market integrity by making financial stability much more difficult to maintain and shifts in regulatory policy more likely. If size is such an important factor in the efficiency of financial markets, how to make them grow becomes an important consideration. Two factors that limit the size of a financial market are the size of its economy and the fact that financial activities servicing the domestic economy are usually denominated in the domestic currency. Seen in this light, the potential benefits of economic and monetary union like that adopted in Europe make sense for regions with a high degree of economic integration and interdependence. In Hong Kong, the international financial centre serving the fourth-largest and the fastest-growing economy in the world, the size of the economy should be a much smaller constraint than in other places. And the usual constraint arising from the use of different currencies need not be insurmountable. With the right approach, we should be able to grow where others cannot. Another interesting aspect of the financial markets in Hong Kong and the Mainland is that, for historical and other reasons, there are often two markets for basically the same financial instruments. For example, shares in a number of Mainland companies are traded as H shares in Hong Kong and as A shares on the Mainland. Although traded in different currencies and catering for different groups of market participants, and subject to different supervisory and regulatory requirements, they are essentially the same instrument with holders sometimes even having the same voting and other rights. It is clear, at least to me, that there would be big advantages if the two markets for these instruments were linked: overall liquidity would be increased, price discovery would be made more efficient, market discipline would be promoted, and it would be easier for market players, intermediaries and the authorities to manage risk. So if bigger markets are better than smaller ones, and there is an overlap in the instruments traded in Mainland and Hong Kong markets, it seems to me that there would be obvious advantages for the country as a whole in linking the two. Let me make it clear that I am not talking about unification - that is not an option, at least for the foreseeable future ˇV but rather the creation of a channel between the two markets that will allow them to function as one and enjoy the benefits of one, much larger market. The question, as always, is how, and I will outline some thoughts on that next week.
Joseph Yam ˇ@ Click here for previous articles in this column. ˇ@ |
ˇ@
