|
Hong Kong's strengths as
an international financial centre
With the focus of
international financial markets increasingly shifting to Asia, Hong
Kong’s world-class infrastructure makes it the logical
international financial centre for the region.
We all have aspirations - to
sprint 100 metres in less than 10 seconds, to score straight As in
the HKCEE, to get a first-class honours degree in university, to
lower our golf handicap to single digits, to own a house, to be a
billionaire or to be healthy. Some of these aspirations are more
achievable than others; many are mere dreams to occupy the idle
mind. Achievable or not, life would be so boring and meaningless
without them. We have to be imaginative and explore our boundaries.
But we also have to be realistic about our limitations.
Hong Kong aspires to be an
international centre of quite a lot of things. Some of these
aspirations are enshrined in law and included in development plans.
In the market-oriented global environment, for Hong Kong to be an
international centre invariably requires the international market in
whatever tradable goods we are talking about to be located in Hong
Kong. For Hong Kong to qualify as an international financial centre,
for example, the minimum requirement is for the key international
financial markets to be located here. Since finance basically
involves financial intermediation, or the meeting of investors and
fund raisers, we qualify as an international financial centre if
investors and fund raisers from outside Hong Kong (including those
from the Mainland) use the financial intermediation channels in Hong
Kong.
There are important
conditions for an international market in something - a commodity
(spot or future) or a type of service - to be located in or
re-located to a particular place. I think two of these conditions
are of crucial importance. First is the existence of a
cost-effective, efficient and safe market infrastructure. By this I
would include the trading platform, involving the intermediaries
such as the brokers and market-makers, and the payment, settlement,
clearing and custodian arrangements. Second is the willingness of
those supplying and demanding the tradable commodity or service and
its derivatives to use the market. This in turn depends on a host of
factors, and among these the liquidity of the market and its ability
to perform the function of price discovery efficiently are
important.
So if we aspire to be an
international centre of something and attempt to establish the
relevant international market in Hong Kong, we have to work on these
conditions. The market infrastructure is not difficult to build,
particularly the hardware side of it, given the advances in
information technology in recent years. And since infrastructure
items are, more often than not, public goods, the funding for them
should also not be a problem because it can justifiably come from
the public sector if it is not forthcoming from the private sector.
The willingness of market
participants to use the market in Hong Kong is a more difficult
issue. This is particularly so when there are already established
international markets elsewhere. For example, why should a textile
manufacturer, who needs to lock-in a particular price for his cotton
(and therefore his production costs) by buying it for future
delivery, not go to the established cotton futures market in the US?
Not that we have a cotton futures market in Hong Kong anyway. But
there are less stark examples that perhaps we can work on. The
foreign exchange market, for example, is fairly active in Hong Kong.
There is adequate liquidity to cope with large orders and our
supporting infrastructure is arguably the best in the world,
particularly in managing settlement or “Herstatt” risks.
Furthermore, there should be considerable demand and supply arising
from economic or trading activities in our time zone. After all, the
bulk of the foreign reserves of the world are held by economies in
this region.
The distribution of global
activity - economic, trade, finance and commodity - relative to the
location of its originator is definitely shifting to our time zone.
I would not be surprised if the majority of certain global financial
activities now originated in a few jurisdictions in this
region. Perhaps there is a case for the location of the relevant
international markets to be shifted to this time zone as well, since
trading activities and liquidity gravitate towards where the
underlying demand and supply and the associated information
originate. This would reduce the need for market participants to
stay up late at offices, leaving their family members waiting at
home.
The Mainland is becoming a
very significant player in international financial markets. It is a
firm policy of China to support the development of financial
services in Hong Kong and maintain its status as an international
financial centre. This is clearly laid down in the eleventh
five-year plan. Perhaps a good way of implementing this policy would
be for the Mainland’s international financial activities to make
greater use of Hong Kong before going to other jurisdictions in
other time zones. Of course, this should be done on market-based
principles, and without compromising cost-effectiveness.
Joseph Yam
28 September 2006
Click here
for previous articles in this column.
|