|
Luncheon of the
Hong Kong Foreign Bank Representatives Association
5 September 2000, Hong Kong Club
"The current state
of banking reform in Hong Kong"
Speech
by
David Carse
Deputy Chief Executive
Hong Kong Monetary Authority
Ladies and gentlemen,
1. I am pleased to have the opportunity to
address this lunch gathering of the Hong Kong Foreign Bank
Representatives Association. As an international financial centre,
it is the essence of Hong Kong that it should be a host to foreign
banks. And as the banking regulator in Hong Kong, it is important
that the HKMA should keep in close touch with foreign banks through
events such as today's lunch. This gives us a chance to explain
aspects of our policies and how we see the current state of banking
in Hong Kong. It also gives you the opportunity to provide feedback
to the HKMA on any issues of current concern to you. Hopefully, I
will not have to address too many hostile questions.
The 1998 Banking Sector Consultancy Study
2. I have chose to speak to you today on the
subject of "The current state of banking reform in Hong
Kong". This seems a good time to undertake this stocktaking. It
is over a year since we embarked on the reform programme that we
devised in response to the Banking Sector Consultancy Study
undertaken by KPMG and Barents in 1998. A number of the measures in
the programme are directly relevant to foreign banks and you may
therefore be interested to hear about what we have done so far, and
what more we have in mind.
The current state of the banking sector
3. The Consultancy Study was conceived just
before the outbreak of the Asian Crisis and took place during it.
The Hong Kong banking sector has now come through the crisis, and
can be said to have clearly demonstrated its resilience and
underlying strength. It is true that the number of foreign banks in
Hong Kong has fallen sharply over the last two years. This reflects
the fallout from the crisis that has led to the demise of some banks
and has required others to cut back on their overseas operations and
return to their home base. Hong Kong has certainly not been the only
financial centre to witness this retreat.
4. However, the important point is that the core
of the Hong Kong banking system - represented by the local banks and
the large foreign players - has remained intact. Although bad debts
rose sharply during the crisis and a few banks lost money, the banks
generally remained profitable and financially sound. The capital
ratios of the local banks actually rose during the crisis period. No
banks failed and no depositors lost money. The Government was not
called upon to provide financial support.
5. The results of the banks for the first half of
this year show that their recovery from the crisis is well underway.
Profits rose sharply and bad debts were lower. This means that the
clouds that have hung over the banking system for the last two years
have now lifted. But it would be wrong to conclude that life for the
banks will go on much the same way as it did before in the golden
years before the crisis. The competitive environment for the banks
is becoming increasingly intense. Of course, you can argue that
there is nothing new in this. The banking system in Hong Kong has
always been competitive, which is one of the reasons it was able to
cope with the Asian crisis. But competition in past years was taking
place in highly buoyant conditions and within defined limits,
reflecting in part the influence of the interest rate rules of the
Hong Kong Association of Banks.
The competitive environment
6. Now things are somewhat different. A number of
major players in the market, including some foreign banks, are
competing even more intensely than they did before. Some of them
have recently increased their presence in Hong Kong or are planning
to do so. In some cases, this presence may be in virtual form as
banks increasingly offer their services in whole or in part over the
internet. This is part of a worldwide trend towards greater
competition. But it is happening in Hong Kong at a time when lending
growth has still not recovered along with the economy. Domestic
loans showed no increase in the first seven months of this year. The
result is that loan to deposit ratios have fallen to their lowest
levels for many years - around 53% for the local banks as a group.
7. The effect on loan margins has been quite
dramatic. In particular, the margin on mortgage loans has fallen
from 1.25% over prime rate prior to the crisis to the current low of
2.25% below prime.
8. The current situation may to some extent be
temporary. It is difficult to believe that loan demand will not pick
up soon given the pace of economic recovery in Hong Kong. Sentiment
in the property market is now looking better and this may start to
feed through into increased appetite for mortgage loans. But it
seems unlikely that the boom conditions of the 1990s will return for
the foreseeable future.
9. The implication of this is that the banks in
Hong Kong may have to cope in the future with an environment of more
restrained loan growth and finer margins. This means that they will
need to find alternative means to boost income. One option is to
diversify into the sale of products like unit trusts, pensions and
life insurance that offer the opportunity to earn fee income.
Another is to focus on lending to sectors such as the SMEs that
provide higher returns at the expense of higher risk. A common
factor in such initiatives is the need to cope with greater
complexity in business development and risk management. Technology
can help to deal with these issues, but this creates its own set of
problems. Banks need to be able to afford the necessary investment
in technology and to develop or obtain the expertise to utilise
technology properly.
The objectives of our reform measures
10. The KPMG/Barents Consultancy Study broadly
anticipated these trends. The policy prescription was that we should
not stand in the way of the forces of change, nor should we simply
do nothing and see what happens. Rather, it was concluded that we
should try to manage the process of change through careful reform.
The underlying aim of our reform package therefore is to help to
improve efficiency and innovation in the banking sector through
increased competition. Among other things, this might provide
incentives for the local banks to think harder about merger and
acquisition.
11. If we had simply done nothing and left
competitive barriers, like the interest rate rules, in place, this
might have sent misleading signals to the local banks, and prevented
them from reacting quickly enough to the changes taking place around
them.
12. A further objective of our reforms was to
increase the attractiveness of Hong Kong as international financial
centre. Also, bearing in mind that increased competition can bring
with it increased risk, we were also conscious of the need to take
steps to enhance the safety and stability of the banking system.
13. I am not in this speech going to summarise
all our reform measures, which are due to be implemented over the
period to the end of 2001. Instead, I will describe what we have
done so far, and the main tasks that remain to be done.
The progress on competitive reforms
14. So far we have introduced three main changes
that are intended to promote competition:
- In September 1999, the one-building condition that applied to
foreign banks licensed after 1978 was relaxed to allow such
banks to open branches in a maximum of three separate buildings.
At the same time we eliminated any restriction on the number of
regional and back offices that foreign banks can maintain.
- In December 1999, we announced that agreement had been reached
with the various parties involved for restricted licence banks
to join the RTGS interbank payment system. The detailed legal
arrangements were finalised in May of this year and a formal
invitation to join the system was issued to those RLBs with a
clear business need to do so.
- Finally, at the beginning of July of this year, we embarked on
the first phase of deregulation of the remaining interest rate
rules. This involved removal of the interest rate cap on time
deposits with a maturity of less than 7 days. Following this,
all time deposits are now completely deregulated.
15. What has been the reaction to these changes?
The answer is that not much has happened so far. Despite the fears
of some of the local banks that they would have to cope with a flood
of new foreign bank branches, no foreign banks have as yet taken the
opportunity to establish additional branches. Of course, many
foreign banks are engaged in wholesale, corporate or private banking
business in Hong Kong and do not require an extensive branch
network. Moreover, a number of banks are still recovering from the
Asian crisis or are in the process of merging, and are not in an
expansion mode at present. As mentioned previously, however, there
are some foreign banks that are enthusiastic about building up their
presence in Hong Kong. But perhaps for these, the organic route of
establishing new branches, and having these limited to three, is too
slow and restrictive. Acquisition of an existing operation is likely
to be a more attractive for such banks.
16. We have already said that we will review the
impact of the three building condition in the first quarter of 2001.
If it appears that it is serving little useful purpose - because
there is not in any case a huge demand on the part of foreign banks
for additional branches - we may simply dispense with the condition
altogether.
17. Similarly, no RLB has yet applied to join the
RTGS system. It is however early days for this, and we are aware
that some of the more active RLBs are considering whether to apply.
They will need to weigh the costs and benefits of direct membership
compared with the existing practice of using a settlement bank. The
important point is that the RLBs are now in a position to make that
choice based on their own business needs. If the RLBs feel that
there are any remaining impediments to their joining the system we
would be pleased to hear from them.
Interest rate deregulation
18. The first phase of interest deregulation also
produced a muted response. This is not unexpected nor is it
unwelcome. We are trying to avoid "big bang" deregulation
that might be disruptive. Some banks have introduced new overnight
deposit accounts, which pay interest above the savings account rate.
But so far we have not seen any large-scale migration from savings
accounts to 24-hour call accounts.
19. This is perhaps not surprising given the
ample liquidity in the banking system, which means that the banks
have a reduced incentive to bid actively for fresh deposits. This is
reflected in the unusually small differential between the interest
rate on savings accounts and those on time deposits. For example,
the gap between the savings account rate and the one-month time
deposit rate was only about 0.5% at the end of August. This reduces
the incentive for depositors to forego the loss of liquidity
involved in switching into time deposits.
20. Of course, there could be a more significant
impact in July 2001 when the process of deregulation is due to be
completed with the removal of the interest rate cap on savings
accounts and of the prohibition of interest on current accounts.
Based on self-assessments that we asked the banks to prepare earlier
this year, there is a general view that competition in the banking
sector will intensify after the final phase of deregulation and that
there could be quite a significant impact on the net interest
margin.
21. That was also the conclusion of the KPMG/Barents
Consultancy Study. But the actual impact will obviously depend on
the conditions at the time. If the supply of deposits remains ample
in a year's time, banks will have less reason to bid aggressively
for deposits. Despite this, many banks may use deregulation as an
opportunity to try to gain market share and to attract new customers
by offering new deposit products with an attractive interest rate.
Innovation and competition of that kind is what deregulation is
intended to achieve. It should also encourage more efficiency in
pricing and the elimination of cross-subsidisation. Expect therefore
to see more transaction fees and charges to recover servicing costs,
and use of differential pricing to encourage customers with low and
volatile balances to use less costly delivery channels such as the
internet.
The need for fairness and transparency
22. Banks are at liberty to impose such fees and
charges, but it is essential that they should be fair and
transparent in doing so. This is particularly the case if the banks
are intending to get more involved in consumer and wealth management
business where it is important to retain the trust of the customer.
The banks cannot afford a bad image otherwise they may find their
customers going elsewhere - for example, to internet-based financial
institutions.
23. As we have seen from some recent incidents,
the banks in Hong Kong have been lagging behind in the provision of
clear information to their customers about the cost of some
financial products such as credit card advances. Moreover, there has
been recent controversy about the provisions in credit card
agreements that entitle the lenders to reclaim from debtors the full
legal costs and expenses of recovering overdue debts. In a recent
court case, the judge ruled that the relevant provisions were
unconscionable and therefore could not be enforced.
24. We have written to authorised institutions to
ask them to review their terms and conditions in the light of the
court's ruling and to ensure that they are consistent with Hong Kong
law. We have also initiated a review of the Code of Banking Practice
with a view to strengthening the provisions on such issues as
transparency in the provision of banking services and the proper and
responsible use of debt collection agents. These issues are already
addressed in the Code to some extent, and perhaps if the spirit of
the Code had been more closely adhered to, some of the recent bad
publicity for the banks could have been avoided. However, it is
evident that the Code needs to be made more specific in some areas,
and the issue of how to ensure compliance must also be addressed.
25. The Code of Banking Practice is not part of
our reform measures, but I have digressed to talk about it for two
reasons. First, as already indicated, it becomes all the more
important in a deregulated environment to ensure that there is a
fair and balanced relationship between banks and their customers.
Second, the fact that we are going to have to devote resources to
this issue for the rest of this year means that one of our reform
measures, namely a review of the current three tier system of
authorisation, will be postponed from this year to next. This will
also allow us to take into account the results of our forthcoming
review of deposit protection arrangements, which may have a bearing
on the minimum size of deposits that authorised institutions which
are not licensed banks should be allowed to take.
Safety and soundness of the banking system
26. Deposit protection is part of what might be
called the safety net arrangements for the banking system. As the
name suggests the safety net is there to catch banks that are in
trouble or, if not the banks, then at least their depositors. This
is part of the other aspect of our reform measures that are aimed at
promoting the safety and soundness of the banking system.
27. One aspect of this is already in place in the
form of a policy statement issued by the HKMA in June of last year
on its role as Lender of Last Resort to authorised institutions.
28. The major safety and soundness issues however
lie ahead. The first is whether we should introduce a commercial
credit reference agency in Hong Kong which would gather and collate
information from participating institutions about the indebtedness
and credit record of their corporate borrowers. This would enable
lenders to obtain a more complete picture of the financial position
of their customers, and thus improve their credit assessment and
perhaps make them willing to lend. That is the theory, which seems
to be supported by both academic research and the experience of
overseas countries. We are currently nearing the end of a
consultation period and will consider the way forward in the light
of the comments received.
29. As this consultation ends, we are about to
embark on another that may be more contentious. I am referring to
the possible enhancement of the deposit protection arrangements in
Hong Kong. In their Consultancy Study, KPMG/Barents identified this
as an important issue as the banking sector becomes more competitive
and the level of risk possibly increases. They also considered that
the current arrangements, which give priority to small depositors,
did not appear to have sufficiently raised the crisis of confidence
threshold to avoid bank runs. They therefore recommended that the
issue of deposit protection should be looked at again.
30. This we have done in the form of a new
consultancy study by Arthur Andersen that was completed in July of
this year. This has looked at various options for deposit
protection, including maintenance of the status quo at one extreme
and the introduction of an explicit scheme for deposit insurance at
the other. Such schemes are increasingly being introduced around the
world and are advocated by a number of international standard
setting bodies. The drawbacks of deposit insurance are however well
known, including the risk of increased systemic instability due to
moral hazard. The costs of such a scheme would also need to be
carefully considered.
31. This is a controversial issue that will need
to be fully debated. Subject to views of Exco, it is our intention
to undertake a consultation on the various options for deposit
protection at the beginning of October. If it is eventually decided
to introduce one of these options, further consultation would then
be required on the detailed arrangements.
Risk-based supervision
32. Of course, the best thing would be for the
safety net not to be actually used. In other words, we should be
trying to prevent banks getting into difficulties in the first
place. This requires effective management by the banks themselves as
well as careful monitoring by the banking supervisors. The first of
these we have tried to address through our recent Guideline on the
Corporate Governance of Locally Incorporated Authorised
Institutions. This is intended to encourage high standards of
management in such institutions and thus help them to deal with the
challenges ahead.
33. These challenges also require enhancements to
our system of banking supervision. As recommended by KPMG/Barents,
we are introducing a more risk-based approach. This aims to be more
forward-looking than the old style of supervision. It focuses more
precisely on the various types of risk being run by individual
banks, the quantity of such risks and the quality of the system used
to manage them. If used properly, it should lead to a less intrusive
and less burdensome supervisory approach towards well-managed
institutions.
34. We have been developing this approach over
the last year and have applied it to a number of the local banks. We
intend to roll it out to cover foreign banks next year. It is
important that the whole process should be transparent and to assist
in this we intend to issue a framework document quite shortly which
will outline the new approach. We are also engaged in a major
rewrite of our supervisory guidelines to make them more
user-friendly and to put them into a common format. This is a
substantial project that will take about a year to complete. In the
meantime, we shall be issuing new and revised supervisory guidelines
in the new format as they come off the production line.
Conclusions
35. To sum up, our reform package is not intended
to be revolutionary. The Hong Kong banking system is already
well-managed and competitive. But even good players need to improve
their game as conditions became tougher. The main responsibility for
doing this in the Hong Kong banking context will rest with the banks
themselves. We in the HKMA are trying to do our bit by removing
possible barriers to change in a cautious manner, and by making sure
that our supervisory approach remains appropriate to the changing
market environment.
Hong Kong Monetary Authority
5 September 2000 |