[Note : The latest position of unsettled appeals is
shown in either (a) Table of Appeals to Court of First Instance or (b)
Table of Appeals to Court of Appeal/Court of Final Appeal. When the
final outcome of an appeal is known, the position is set out in either
table and will disappear in the next issue of Board of Review
Decisions.]
|
Decision
No
|
| PENALTY TAX - |
|
| failing
to report income in tax return – s
82A
of the Inland Revenue Ordinance (‘IRO’) – whether or not to
impose penalty tax under the circumstances in which there was no
fraud and the failure to report was an unintentional mistake.
[Decision in Chinese] |
D71/05
(PDF file - Trad. Chinese)
D71/05
(PDF file - Simp. Chinese) D71/05 (Word file - Trad. Chinese)
D71/05
(Word file - Simp. Chinese)
|
| filing
of an incorrect return – imposition of additional tax under s
82A
of the IRO – ss 64(3) & 70 of the Inland Revenue Ordinance
(‘IRO’) – compromise reached between taxpayer and IRD as to
quantum of assessable income – whether final and conclusive |
D78/05
(PDF file)
D78/05 (Word file)
|
| incorrect
tax return – reasonable excuse – excessive assessment –
co-operation – Inland Revenue Ordinance (‘IRO’) ss 70 and 82 |
D4/06
(PDF file)
D4/06 (Word file)
|
PROFITS TAX -
|
|
whether
or not the sale of small house is a trade activity – whether or
not the stated intention was realistic and realizable – badges
of trade – the time to have the intention to trade to ascertain
the market value of the small house as the cost to calculate the
profits. [Decision in
Chinese]
|
D73/05
(PDF file - Trad. Chinese)
D73/05
(PDF file - Simp. Chinese)
D73/05 (Word file - Trad. Chinese)
D73/05
(Word file - Simp. Chinese)
|
sale
of rebuilt residential property – intention at the time of
rebuilding – onus of proof on the appellant – ss 14(1) and
68(4) of the Inland Revenue Ordinance (‘IRO’). [Decision
in Chinese]
|
D74/05
(PDF file - Trad. Chinese)
D74/05
(PDF file - Simp. Chinese)
D74/05 (Word file - Trad. Chinese)
D74/05
(Word file - Simp. Chinese)
|
practice
& procedure –language of proceedings – whether proceedings
ought to be conducted in Chinese or English – bias – recusal
application – s 68(
1A
)(a) of the Inland Revenue Ordinance (‘IRO’) – whether
appeal should be dismissed or withdrawn
|
D75/05
(PDF file)
D75/05 (Word file)
|
onus
wholly on the appellant to show the assessment excessive or
incorrect – ss 16(1), 17(1)(a) and 68(4) of the Inland Revenue
Ordinance (‘IRO’).
|
D1/06
(PDF file)
D1/06 (Word file)
|
sources
of the trading profits and commission income – whether the
‘profits arising in or derived from’ Hong Kong - claim for
deduction of expenses related to the dismissal of a director –
whether the expenditure incurred ‘in the production of
profits’ – the validity of additional assessments - whether
the additional assessments involve ‘re-opening of any matter
which has been determined on objection or appeal for the year’
– application for leave to rely on further grounds – whether
the proposed amendments are sufficiently intelligible with
adequate particularity - ss 14(1), 16(1), 50, 60, 64(3)&(4), 66(3), 68(4),
68(9) and 70 of the Inland Revenue
Ordinance (‘IRO’).
|
D10/06
(PDF file)
D10/06 (Word file)
|
SALARIES TAX -
|
|
claims
for the deduction of home loan interest – delay of the Inland
Revenue Department to notify the taxpayer – ss 26E and 60(1) of
the Inland Revenue Ordinance (‘IRO’) – whether or not a
beneficial owner of an interest in the property in question can
claim for home loan interest |
D70/05
(PDF file)
D70/05 (Word file)
|
whether
or not the sum of money is severance payment which is exempted
from salaries tax – the nature of the sum of money – ss
6(2)(c),
32A
(1)(c) and 32B of the Employment Ordinance – whether or not live
difficulties can be a reason to have exemption from salaries tax.
[Decision in Chinese] |
D72/05
(PDF file - Trad. Chinese)
D72/05
(PDF file - Simp. Chinese)
D72/05 (Word file - Trad. Chinese)
D72/05
(Word file - Simp. Chinese)
|
home
loan interest deduction – ss 26E &
26F
of the Inland Revenue Ordinance (‘IRO’) – whether loan of
money applied wholly or in part for the acquisition of a dwelling
– whether appellant discharged burden of showing assessments
were excessive
|
D76/05
(PDF file)
D76/05 (Word file)
|
home
loan interest deduction – ss 26E &
26F
of the Inland Revenue Ordinance (‘IRO’) – whether loan of
money applied wholly or in part for the acquisition of a dwelling
– whether appellant discharged burden of showing assessments
were excessive
|
D77/05
(PDF file)
D77/05 (Word file)
|
income
from an employment of profit in Hong Kong – exclusion where
services all rendered and performed outside
Hong Kong
– s 8(
1A
)(b) of the Inland Revenue Ordinance (‘IRO’)
|
D79/05
(PDF file)
D79/05 (Word file)
|
home
loan interest deduction – beneficial owner as opposed to legal
(registered) owner – ss 2 and 26E of the Inland Revenue
Ordinance (‘IRO’)
|
D80/05
(PDF file)
D80/05 (Word file)
|
services
rendered ordinarily outside
Hong Kong
except on one occasion – whether exemption – Inland Revenue
Ordinance (‘IRO’) s 8(
1A
)
|
D2/06
(PDF file)
D2/06 (Word file)
|
refund
of rent or financial assistance – intention of making payment
– Inland Revenue Ordinance (‘IRO’) ss 9(1)(a) and 9(
1A
)(ii) |
D3/06
(PDF file)
D3/06 (Word file)
|
cash
allowance or refund of rent – Inland Revenue Ordinance (‘IRO’)
ss 9(1)(a) and 9(
1A
)(a) |
D5/06
(PDF file)
D5/06 (Word file)
|
time
apportionment for employment outside
Hong Kong
– double taxation – ss 8(1)(a), 8(
1A
)(a) and 68(8) of the Inland Revenue Ordinance (‘IRO’)
|
D6/06
(PDF file)
D6/06 (Word file)
|
home
loan interest deductions – ss 26E,
26F
, 60 and 68(4) of the Inland Revenue Ordinance (‘IRO’)
|
D8/06
(PDF file)
D8/06 (Word file)
|
home
loan interest deductions
|
D9/06
(PDF file)
D9/06 (Word file)
|
home loan interest – a distinction between legal
ownership and beneficial ownership - amount of deduction of
mortgage interest paid in respect of a property held by the spouse
of a joint-tenant - s 26E(1) of the Inland Revenue Ordinance
(‘the IRO’)
|
D11/06
(PDF file)
D11/06 (Word file)
|
whether the assessment appealed against is excessive or
incorrect – the onus of proof is on the appellant - s 68(4),
(8)(a) of the Inland Revenue Ordinance (‘the IRO’)
|
D12/06
(PDF file)
D12/06 (Word file)
|
back
|
|